## Arch Linux
Let's get this out of the way -- yes, Arch is less stable than Debian (by design). As you likely already know, Arch uses "rolling release" package management. This means Arch is getting the newest updates for software as they release. This can cause instability when two (or more) packages conflict with each other. While this seems like a major issue, it really isn't as long as you are using it in the right scenario. There is a time and a place for Arch. If you are daily driving is as your main desktop OS, you're fine. But if you need linux for running a long-term server, Arch isn't the right choice.

One thing about Arch that makes it so special is the Arch User Repository (AUR). I'm gonna type more about that later.

### Pros
- Rolling Release
  - Newer hardware will be supported faster, alongside older hardware.
  - Cutting-edge features.
- Arch User Repository
  - Just about any software you can imagine.
- Usually Faster

### Cons
- Rolling Release
  - You update VLC Media Player, and now your PC won't boot (this wont actually happen)

### Overall
Better for your normal, everyday PC, but not for servers.

## CachyOS

The best OS ever. If you don't know which one to pick, use this. Perfect middle ground. Fast performance and easy to use.

## Debian
Debian is like Arch but will use old software versions to ensure stability. Rarely are you actually using functionality, unless it's in a really specific niche. Even then, you can install the software manually.

### Pros
- Stable
  - Don't have to worry much about software compatibility, unless it's cutting edge software.

### Cons
- Politics
  - Debian does a lot of political things, not everyones cup of tea. Not getting into it here.

### Overall
Great for servers, but also fine for a personal PC. If you want an easier experience overall, just use Debian.